Archived Messages for CLAS_GSIM@cebaf.gov: RE: NOSEC "ALL" and NOSEC "(all components)" & NOGEOM

RE: NOSEC "ALL" and NOSEC "(all components)" & NOGEOM

JianGuo Zhao (JZHAO@mitlns.mit.edu)
Wed, 25 Mar 1998 14:46:18 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Maurik Holtrop: "Re: NOSEC "ALL" and NOSEC "(all components)" & NOGEOM"
Previous message: Maurik Holtrop: "Re: NOSEC "ALL" and NOSEC "(all components)" & NOGEOM"

OK, I did some more tests on the volume OTHE

NOSEC 'OTHE' 2:50/per 100 events
NOGEOM 'OTHE' 4:16/per 100 events

These results are also repeatable.

It appears that by doing NO SECONDARIES in the other volume (non active volume)
we can save CPU time by a factor of 3.

I think I need to understand what these OTHE are, how they affect our results
by doing NOSEC 'OTHE' and why NOGEOM 'OTHE' is not as effective as
NOGEOM 'OTHE'.

Jianguo

Next message: Maurik Holtrop: "Re: NOSEC "ALL" and NOSEC "(all components)" & NOGEOM"
Previous message: Maurik Holtrop: "Re: NOSEC "ALL" and NOSEC "(all components)" & NOGEOM"